Journal of Humanities and AI (JHAI) uses a double-blind peer review process to ensure fairness and impartiality; authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other throughout review.

• • Each submission is first evaluated by a screening committee of two specialists appointed by the editorial board.
• • Review outcomes are classified as: publishable, publishable after revision, re-examination after revision, or unpublishable.
• • If the two reviewers disagree, the manuscript undergoes an additional review as determined by the editorial board.
• • The editorial board notifies authors of the decision. Authors of accepted manuscripts must address required revisions and editorial requests.
• • Reviewers must provide objective, confidential evaluations and disclose any conflicts of interest. Editors and reviewers may not use unpublished material for personal or professional gain.